I Wish I Was Making This Shit Up

“If a penis is on a woman then it’s not male genitalia, it’s her penis, it’s a woman’s penis, it’s woman’s genitalia. Just like if a vulva is on a man it’s not female genitalia, it’s his vulva, it’s a man’s vulva, it’s male genitalia. The only person who get’s to define those body parts is the person who has them. Not you, not anybody else, just that person. So no, lesbians don’t like “biological women” and saying that is really fucking cissexist. If you prefer vulvas on your sexual partners that’s fine, we’re all allowed to have a preference, but it’s not that you prefer “girl parts” it’s that you prefer vulva and you don’t like penis. Those body parts are not inherently tied to any one sex or gender. Being sexually assaults, raped, abused, beaten, or any other sort of violation does NOT give you an excuse to be a cissexist asshole and start defining people’s body parts for them. NOBODY gets to do that, that’s fucked up. People have the right to choose how they define their own bodies and their own body parts. Having panic attacks from penises doesn’t make you transphobic but you’re clearly a cissexist douche for reasons that have nothing to do with your fear of penises and you need to spend some time reevaluating your language and the ways you relate to other people.”

Lesbians! Wake Up Please!

17 comments

  1. BadDyke · ·

    “Those body parts are not inherently tied to any one sex or gender.”

    Stop blubbing about biology transdudes.

    Radfems didn’t invent sex chromosomes and large, non-motile gametes, and the body parts that go along with them. Blame a billion years of evolution.

    “People have the right to choose how they define their own bodies and their own body parts.”

    People have the right to choose how they define gravity, and how gravity relates to their bodies, just don’t blame us when you fall off a cliff because gravity didn’t listen to you……………..Or from pointing out beforehand that SOME aspects of reality have an objective existence outside your personal definitions and redefinitions, and that standing so near the edge probably wasn’t a good idea, whilst you berated us for attacking your identity as a weightless person…………………….

  2. michelle · ·

    shaking my head…

    seems like every time I feel like they cannot get any stranger, they come up with yet another way to try and ignore biological realities. I’ll concede the point that they can call themselves whatever they want or use whatever language they want in magical unicorn land, but in the meantime, the rest of us in the real world will call things as we see them…and I’m going to have to call the above diatribe some ‘seriously deluded shit.’

  3. Every time they open their mouths they leave NO doubt just how mentally ill they really are. It’s very sad that the best the medical/psychological industry has been able to do is just UNLEASH their madness on women and especially on lesbians.

    Goddess wept.

    1. This quote came from a “cis woman,” though.

      1. michelle · ·

        Anyone who wants to claim that ‘cis’ label that the transwhacktivists created as an alternate reality ALSO would seem to live in magical unicorn land. Ergo, the diatribe still gets filed under ‘seriously deluded shit.’

  4. doublevez · ·

    About 20 yrs old seriously deluded shit? Why are we even paying any attention to this?

    I have an idea: Let’s ask # 2.

  5. If a penis is on a woman then it’s not male genitalia, it’s her penis, it’s a woman’s penis, it’s woman’s genitalia. Just like if a vulva is on a man it’s not female genitalia, it’s his vulva, it’s a man’s vulva, it’s male genitalia.

    Hilarious. Try to “sell” that concept to regular people outside the trans cult. I guarantee, a white jacket with very long arms is what awaits.

    Those body parts are not inherently tied to any one sex or gender.

    Here is the little game where they try to claim two things at once. For instance, they will say things to the effect of ‘gender trumps sex’, but here they are trying to put sex and gender on equal footing. Again, try to sell that stuff to the general public, who are fairly up to speed on the whole ‘birds and the bees’ thing.

    The entire reason we keep hearing about this crap, genitals ‘marketed by gender’ is because the vast majority of trans persons (male and female) only go for what they call “top surgery”. Most of them keep their ‘original plumbing’, because the so-called ‘gender reassignment surgery’ is only an approximation of genitals, that do not function like biological ones.

    But I adore the irony at the end:

    and you need to spend some time reevaluating your language

    There are not enough LOLs in the world for that one.

  6. thebewilderness · ·

    “When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean – neither more nor less.”

  7. If we all just pointed at them and laughed derisively, would they go away?

  8. Sheela · ·

    Chemists would be bemused as to why the gender obsessives are so keen on the trans/cis lingo, as cis molecules or compounds are healthy, naturally symmetrical ones that (in the case of proteins and fats) break down properly and healthily whereas the artificial processed/hydrogenated/forced trans fats/sugars/proteins are far less digestible and linked to cancer and heart disease. A glance at any chemistry textbook or prob on the internet will divulge the difference. Trans compounds were developed by the food corporations to increase shelf life but are now known to extremely unhealthy So the trans v cis analogy is neither an attractive one (for them at least) nor apt…
    And biochemically they’ll have a job making ‘cis scum die’!

    1. ethicalequinox · ·

      Trans activists’ discussions of biology don’t smell too different to me than hardcore creation scientists’ understanding of the evolution of the world. Dinosaurs and humans coexisted because I say so and if you disagree you’re totes oppressing christians! And you’re going to HELL too, so there!

      And you’re right. they are totally ripping off biochem by using the terms trans and cis. But that’s standard operating procedure for them, I guess…

  9. hearthrising · ·

    Thank you for the chemistry lesson, Sheela. I’ll remember this, and I’ll never look at “die cis scum” the same.

    This (cis) woman offering sex education is entitled to her opinions and her view of the world, but she does seem to be trying to force it onto other people, doesn’t she? I wonder what the motive is, like why it should matter to her if a lesbian doesn’t want to have sex with someone else.

    What’s with this: just because you’ve experienced [male violence] doesn’t give you the right to be a “cissexist asshole.” She’s assuming that lesbians make their choices on who to have sex with only because of violence, and that experiencing sexual violence is no excuse for views about sex. (I’m starting to laugh here; it’s so ridiculous.)

  10. “Being sexually assaults, raped, abused, beaten, or any other sort of violation does NOT give you an excuse to be a cissexist asshole and start defining people’s body parts for them.”

    Is this parody? It reads like parody.

  11. […] that Lesbians confront their “transmisogyny” in the bedroom is demanding that Lesbians cater to Male sexual pleasure. Insisting that Male Biology is Female – based on dubious science – in service to the goal of […]

  12. “Having panic attacks from penises doesn’t make you transphobic but you’re clearly a cissexist douche for reasons that have nothing to do with your fear of penises and you need to spend some time reevaluating your language and the ways you relate to other people.”

    how is this different from what MRAs say at all?

%d bloggers like this: